Free worldwide shipping on every order
Comparisonvs RLPRO 1200

RLPRO 1000 vs 1200

A direct RLPRO 1000 vs 1200 comparison covering output, LEDs, certification, price, and best-fit use cases.

Quick answer: RLPRO 1000 vs RLPRO 1200

RLPRO 1000 and RLPRO 1200 share the same eight wavelengths (630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060nm) and a 3-year warranty. The RLPRO 1200 adds 144 LEDs (864 vs 720), higher published irradiance (at least 197 vs at least 160 mW/cm2), and Health Canada Class II Medical Device Licence #111226. RLPRO 1000 is FDA-listed but is not Health Canada Class II licensed. RLPRO 1000 is $3,900 CAD; RLPRO 1200 is $4,800 CAD. For Canadian clinics, physiotherapy rooms, and buyers who need Health Canada Class II documentation, the $900 CAD premium for RLPRO 1200 is the main decision point.

Wavelengths (both)
630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060nm
RLPRO 1000 irradiance
>=160 mW/cm2
RLPRO 1200 irradiance
>=197 mW/cm2
LED count
RLPRO 1000: 720; RLPRO 1200: 864
Health Canada Class II
RLPRO 1200 (MDL #111226); RLPRO 1000 not licensed
Warranty (both)
3 years
Price
RLPRO 1000 $3,900 CAD; RLPRO 1200 $4,800 CAD

TL;DR: 1200 adds HC licensing and more output.

SpecRLPRO 1000RLPRO 1200
Wavelengths630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060 nm630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060 nm
Irradiance≥160 mW/cm2≥197 mW/cm2
LED count720 LEDs864 LEDs
CertificationsFDA Establishment Registered; not Health Canada Class IIHealth Canada Class II MDL #111226; FDA Establishment Registered
Warranty3 years3 years
Price$3,900 CAD$4,800 CAD

PubMed evidence note: Photobiomodulation dose should be controlled because response can be biphasic [PMID:20011653]. Skin and wound-related PBM evidence is summarized in Avci et al. [PMID:24049929]; knee osteoarthritis reviews report adjunctive pain and function outcomes [PMID:34654554]; and performance-focused PBM reviews report muscle and functional measures in exercise contexts [PMID:39225877].

Which Fits Which Use Case?

The RLPRO 1000 vs 1200 decision is mostly about clinical documentation and throughput. Both panels share the same eight wavelengths, but the RLPRO 1200 adds 144 more LEDs, higher published irradiance, and Health Canada Class II licensing. For clinics, that $900 CAD difference is usually easier to justify than explaining why the lower model lacks Health Canada Class II status.

Choose RLPRO 1000 for serious home use, personal recovery, smaller rooms, and buyers who want the eight-wavelength platform at the lowest Hale price. Choose RLPRO 1200 for clinical rooms, practitioner settings, faster sessions, and buyers comparing RLPRO 1200 vs 2000 before deciding how much coverage they need.

Related decisions include Hale vs MitoRedLight, Hale vs LightStim, and use-specific pages such as muscle recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RLPRO 1200 worth the extra cost?

For clinics and high-frequency users, yes. The RLPRO 1200 adds higher irradiance, more LEDs, and Health Canada Class II licensing for $900 CAD more.

Do RLPRO 1000 and 1200 have the same wavelengths?

Yes. Both list the same eight wavelengths: 630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, and 1060 nm.

Which one is Health Canada Class II?

RLPRO 1200 is Health Canada Class II under MDL #111226. RLPRO 1000 is FDA Establishment Registered only.

Which is better for home use?

RLPRO 1000 is often enough for home users who want lower cost. RLPRO 1200 is better if you want higher output and certification headroom.

Which is better for clinics?

RLPRO 1200 is the better clinic fit because of Health Canada Class II status and higher published irradiance.

Recommended Hale Panels

Health Canada certified, 8 wavelengths (630-1060 nm), built for daily professional use.