Free worldwide shipping on every order
Comparisonvs RLPRO 2000

RLPRO 1200 vs 2000

A commercial-intent RLPRO 1200 vs 2000 comparison focused on coverage, LEDs, use cases, and ROI.

Quick answer: RLPRO 1200 vs RLPRO 2000

RLPRO 1200 and RLPRO 2000 share the same eight wavelengths (630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060nm), identical published irradiance (at least 197 mW/cm2), the same Health Canada Class II Medical Device Licence #111226, and the same 3-year warranty. The RLPRO 2000 adds 288 LEDs (1,152 vs 864) and wider panel coverage, reducing repositioning steps per session. RLPRO 1200 is $4,800 CAD; RLPRO 2000 is $6,700 CAD. The decision is a coverage and workflow question: RLPRO 1200 fits smaller clinic rooms; RLPRO 2000 is better for high-throughput clinics and broader full-body sessions.

Wavelengths (both)
630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060nm
Irradiance (both)
>=197 mW/cm2
LED count
RLPRO 1200: 864; RLPRO 2000: 1,152
Health Canada Class II (both)
MDL #111226
Warranty (both)
3 years
Price
RLPRO 1200 $4,800 CAD; RLPRO 2000 $6,700 CAD

TL;DR: 1200 fits rooms; 2000 maximizes coverage.

SpecRLPRO 1200RLPRO 2000
Wavelengths630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060 nm630, 650, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 1060 nm
Irradiance≥197 mW/cm2≥197 mW/cm2
LED count864 LEDs1,152 LEDs
CertificationsHealth Canada Class II MDL #111226; FDA Establishment RegisteredHealth Canada Class II MDL #111226; FDA Establishment Registered
Warranty3 years3 years
Price$4,800 CAD$6,700 CAD

PubMed evidence note: Photobiomodulation dose should be controlled because response can be biphasic [PMID:20011653]. Skin and wound-related PBM evidence is summarized in Avci et al. [PMID:24049929]; knee osteoarthritis reviews report adjunctive pain and function outcomes [PMID:34654554]; and performance-focused PBM reviews report muscle and functional measures in exercise contexts [PMID:39225877].

Which Fits Which Use Case?

RLPRO 1200 vs 2000 is a coverage and workflow decision, not a wavelength decision. Both share the same eight wavelengths, same published irradiance, same 3-year warranty, and the same Health Canada Class II licence. The RLPRO 2000 adds width and LED count, which matters when you want fewer repositioning steps per session.

Choose RLPRO 1200 for home gyms, smaller clinics, physiotherapy rooms, chiropractic rooms, and buyers who need Class II licensing without the largest panel footprint. Choose RLPRO 2000 for high-throughput clinics, broad full-body sessions, taller or wider users, and any setup where reducing patient repositioning increases revenue per hour.

If you are still deciding format, compare panels vs beds, panels vs wraps, and Hale vs MitoRedLight.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does RLPRO 2000 have more power than RLPRO 1200?

It has more LEDs and broader coverage. The published irradiance figure is the same at ≥197 mW/cm2.

Which is better for a clinic?

RLPRO 2000 is better for higher-throughput clinics that value broad coverage. RLPRO 1200 is better where room size or budget is tighter.

Do both have Health Canada Class II licensing?

Yes. Both RLPRO 1200 and RLPRO 2000 are covered by Health Canada Class II MDL #111226.

Is RLPRO 2000 worth $1,900 CAD more?

It is worth it when wider coverage reduces repositioning, improves user comfort, or supports more sessions per day.

Which should a home user buy?

Most home users should start with RLPRO 1200 unless they specifically want the widest Hale panel.

Recommended Hale Panels

Health Canada certified, 8 wavelengths (630-1060 nm), built for daily professional use.